|
|
Post by tbw on Mar 4, 2012 23:20:27 GMT -5
BFRO
1] Set off fireworks to bring in curious BF's.
2] Tree knocks and BF howls to get response.
3] Response? Breathy growl from the nearby brush
4] Effect? BF's after discovery of who/what was creating WWIII growled in disdain and beat it no matter how many tree knocks or BF howls they did.
5} There has to be someone smarter than these guys. They didn't even get an infrared from the area where the growl came from. Me? I'd a been outta there if that thing had done that; before BF started throwing rocks the size of Indiana at me. Now we know why they do. They only throw it at dumb asses like that who don't know when to quit. OR, for that matter, how to conduct a proper investigation with the idea of laying eyes on the thing and then conveniently don't do it.
|
|
|
|
Post by strange on Mar 5, 2012 11:43:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tbw on Mar 6, 2012 7:06:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by joewiggs on Mar 6, 2012 16:27:01 GMT -5
Many shady dealings are committed to reap in a substantial payday, especially when dealing with the bizarre and eerie facts of like. BB ( Big Foot) serves as a beacon in the fog for the overly curious and the slightly gullible.
|
|
|
|
Post by joewiggs on Mar 10, 2012 12:06:04 GMT -5
Having said the above, I must admit that there are some strange things doing on this planet that have yet to be satisfactorily explained to my satisfaction.  |
|
|
|
Post by tbw on Mar 11, 2012 8:21:19 GMT -5
Having said the above, I must admit that there are some strange things doing on this planet that have yet to be satisfactorily explained to my satisfaction. Like the battle at the LBH? With all the interpretations we have of this battle, the multitude of attempts to explain things by eliminating equally compelling evidence to the contrary, it might just be safer to believe in BF and a saner thing to do. What experience I have had attempting to find the answers, has turned from safe speculation to outright denigration of one or another's views. And while various attempts to turn the discussion on itself, it instead turns personal and about what one believes as the sole basis of fact. And that isn't the scientific nor is it the historical approach to finding the truth, nor will it ever be. A persons belief isn't established fact, just as someone believes in BF doesn't make them right or wrong. Sure, every once in a while a sensation comes along, you know, like John Gray, and gives everyone false hopes that the answer has finally been found. But as with Gray's own work, the flaw as some cannot see, is the minute difference between persons, places, and things. It is just as easy to place any of them within a spatial context that makes sense, even though such a place for that person, and the things attributed to the events surrounding finds more fault with other witnesses accounts that need to be denounced than embraced tells us what? No. I'm not talking about lying or even liars. I am however talking about aligning everyone's accounts into a snapshot that tells us more about that truth than saying that someone did lie or someone didn't know and discounting, denouncing their statements in favor of something said or alluded to by a minor few. And just as conversely, we do need to pay closer attention to those individual statements that match no other; and have been and are continuing to be discarded each and every time, when in fact, I know for a fact, that in at least one instance, that man stated the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Timing wont give us the truth, Gray knew that. He knew that it might help us to understand that battle better. And I for one think he was right in doing what he did. But I don't think there will ever be a timing that can be conclusively constructed as the killer answer to everything, and that is because of what I've already stated. Me? Heck, excuse me while I go squatch hunting, I think I've got a better chance at finding them than I do at listening to someone's personal religious experience at the LBH. And even then, when it comes to that, I'll hunt up a Native American the next time I'm there and see if I can have a vision quest. |
|
|
|
Post by joewiggs on Mar 11, 2012 10:27:03 GMT -5
Well said my friend and all so very true. Maybe the answers (if any actually exist somewhere, somehow) lies not in the facts themselves nor the myriad of physical possibilities that exist but, in the human mind. Does it really matter if Custer transversed Sharpshooter Ridge or Weir's Point or both? Is it critical to prove that Benteen watered at the Morass for 15, minutes, 17 minutes, or 20 minutes? How essential is it to know if Custer was the last to die, the first, or somewhere in the middle? Questions of a similar ilk have been asked, dissected, disregarded, believed, sworn too, disavowed, and the cause of scorn and faith for "Lo" these many years. There may never be an answer to this seemingly eternal dilemma but, if there is one it lies in the hands of people such as yourself. People who are more than willing to discuss the biting issues in a fashion that encourages comradely and understanding. Only they who insist on standing upon the shaky, unsupported, cliffs of innuendo while insisting that they are "right" and all others are "wrong" become unglued at perceived knuckleheads ( like us)who "ought to know better" look for greener pastures. That is why we, who gratefully stand upon the sane and complacent grounds of "willing to agree to disagree", pay homage to you and thank you for developing this forum wherein we enjoy the freedom to voice our opinions.  |
|
